[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090610083139.GA25538@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:31:39 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: next-20090609 hangs in early user mode
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:00:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The machines are PowerPC64 (so big endian). It looks to me like we use
> bitops on i_state - don't our bitops only apply to unsigned longs?
Yes, bitops need unsigned long. And on most plaforms should give you
warnings when using them on the wrong type.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists