linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: next-20090609 hangs in early user mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090610230728.d56adeff.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:07:28 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: next-20090609 hangs in early user mode

Hi Al,

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:00:54 +0100 Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:00:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > d4fdcb2068eef29c03d6027aa219fa60171c6b87 is first bad commit
> > commit d4fdcb2068eef29c03d6027aa219fa60171c6b87
> > Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > Date:   Thu May 21 16:00:59 2009 -0400
> > 
> >     fs: i_flags and i_state in struct inode only need to be unsigned short
> >     
> >     Currently i_flags and i_state do not need to be an unsigned int and an
> >     unsigned long, respectively.  (We currently use 9 i_flags bits, and 8
> >     i_state bits.)  Changing them to be an unsigned short saves 4 bytes
> >     per inode on an x86 platform, and 8 bytes on an x86_64 platform.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> >     Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> >     Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> *gyah*
> 
> Yes, it's obviously bogus.  Dropped from the tree; I don't think it's
> really salvagable - even merging into one unsigned long will not be
> enough, since we will end up with different locking for different bits.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped