[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090611001957.61b5530b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:19:57 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] headers_check fix patches 20090610
Hi Jaswinder,
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:00:30 +0530 Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The following changes since commit e271e1343a94e081723cb4180af3fdb5fecc1a49:
> Ingo Molnar (1):
> Merge branch 'x86/mce4'
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-top.git master
>
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput (3):
> headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h
> headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h
> headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/swab.h | 2 +-
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++---
> arch/mn10300/include/asm/setup.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Is there some reason that these fixes are not just sent to the appropriate
maintainers? That way we would avoid unnecessary conflicts cropping up.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists