[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090610164853.GI4131@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:48:53 +0800
From: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] crypto: padlock-aes: enable on VIA Nano
Hi all,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 08:42:03PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Chuck Ebbert | 2009-06-09 10:35:33 [-0400]:
>
> >The VIA Nano has a bug that makes the padlock unit fetch extra data
> >during encryption operations. Add workarounds for that, and enable
> >the driver on x86_64.
> Nice. The X86_64 padlock will make it mainline in next merge window so
> I'm asking you kindly to rebase it against Herbert's cryptodev tree [0].
>
> I guess the bug can trigger on 32bit if you boot the affected 64bit CPU
> in 32bit mode? I'm not sure if it is better to send this patches via
> stable tree _or_ deactivate the padlock on affected CPUs.
I have now re-confirmed the errata with VIA/Centaur guys, and it seems correct.
Also, reviewing [but not testing] the patch, it looks correct to me.
The check for stepping '2' is also correct, as stepping 3 no longer has this
issue.
Chuck, I'd be more than thankful if you could rebase and resubmit as requested.
If not, please drop me a not so i can put it on my todo list.
Acked-by: HaraldWelte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>
--
- Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com> http://linux.via.com.tw/
============================================================================
VIA Free and Open Source Software Liaison
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists