linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090610193312.37b944f3@skybook>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:33:12 +0200
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@...il.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
> > Greetings,
> > version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt()
> > fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with
> > the issue.
> > Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to
> > the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2
> > with another tick_nohz_disable().
> 
> Any update on this one ?

I haven't heard anything from any Andy in regard to patch #1. We could
do patch #2 now and decide later what we want to do with the old style
profiler.

blue skies,
  Martin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/