linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF02E4B434.8757FEB7-ON482575D1.000B2BB7-482575D1.000CB7AE@sunplusct.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:14:34 +0800
From:	liqin.chen@...plusct.com
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch-owner@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE

Thanks Arnd, tglx, Sam and all who pay attention to score code.

We will update score arch code to catch up the 
linux/kernel code level. The next patches will
send out soon.

Best Regards
liqin

--


Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> 写于 2009-06-10 00:37:28:

> On Monday 08 June 2009, liqin.chen@...plusct.com wrote:
> > Thanks Arnd, our MIS help me solve the download problem.
> > 
> > > Feel free to base you code on top of asm-generic.git#next, but tell 
me
> > > when you intend to do that so I can warn you of possibly rebases.
> > 
> > Last week, I had updated score code base on asm-generic.git#next.
> > 
> > and I will apply a account on kernel.org, But before I get the 
account,
> > can you let score code merge in asm-generic.git?
> 
> I can take your patches and apply them to a new branch in my tree
> if that helps. I hope that Linus can pull my tree early in the
> merge window so your architecture port and the microblaze changes
> based on it can also get in soon.
> 
> I guess for the new architecture, it makes sense to combine all
> your patches into a single changeset in git, since they don't
> make sense until you have the complete set, and your changeset
> comments are rather boring so far anyway.
> 
> Can you write a few paragraphs of text about your architecture
> for the initial changeset comment? I think it would be good
> to permanently store some facts in there, e.g. in which ways
> the architecture is different from others, where to get a
> toolchain and what kinds of hardware exist for it.
> 
> I'll go through the patches once more and see if I find anything
> that should still be changed before the code goes in, but
> from a brief look, the code looks pretty good now.
> 
>    Arnd <><