linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:16 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mpm@...enic.com,
	npiggin@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat 
> > > suggests it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be much 
> > > to conflict, except kmemcheck - which has more or less trivial 
> > > callbacks there.
> > 
> > The conflicting bits are the patches that remove bootmem allocator 
> > uses in arch/x86 and kernel/sched.c.
> 
> Give me an hour and i'll get some minimal testing done.

Thanks! By the time you're done, I am hopefully in deep sleep (stupid 
time-zones!) dreaming of better kernels. So I won't be able to send a new 
pull request until tomorrow morning. All the patches are in 'for-linus' 
and 'topic/slab/earlyboot' branches and so -tip ones (that are not rebased 
on top of this series) in 'topic/slab/earlyboot-topic' in case you're 
interested.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/