[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906102357370.30933@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:16 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mpm@...enic.com,
npiggin@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat
> > > suggests it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be much
> > > to conflict, except kmemcheck - which has more or less trivial
> > > callbacks there.
> >
> > The conflicting bits are the patches that remove bootmem allocator
> > uses in arch/x86 and kernel/sched.c.
>
> Give me an hour and i'll get some minimal testing done.
Thanks! By the time you're done, I am hopefully in deep sleep (stupid
time-zones!) dreaming of better kernels. So I won't be able to send a new
pull request until tomorrow morning. All the patches are in 'for-linus'
and 'topic/slab/earlyboot' branches and so -tip ones (that are not rebased
on top of this series) in 'topic/slab/earlyboot-topic' in case you're
interested.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists