[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244667934.5982.90.camel@desktop>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:05:34 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
san@...roid.com, rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:24 -0700, Brian Swetland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Russell King - ARM
> Linux<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:31:31PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Is there patch for Dream support for 2.6.30 somewhere? The best I
> >> could find is linux-msm tree, which is ... quite a big diff against
> >> 2.6.24:
> >
> > In short not as far as I know, and I'm very disappointed with the state
> > of affairs with google.
> >
> > Basically, the situation surrounding msm can be described as severely
> > wanting - bear in mind that it's been over a year since we last heard
> > anything from the msm guys as far as code submissions go.
> >
> > Personally, I think we should delete the entire codeset which was
> > submitted into mainline - it's next to useless and all the time that
> > folk sit on their hands not maintaining it, it's just not worth having
> > it anywhere near mainline.
>
> I'd love to find an effective way to get more of the msm support
> cleaned up (as necessary) and into the mainline. We're bringing our
> work forward and rebasing to keep tracking the latest released kernel,
> and working on getting core bits we need that other stuff depends on
> in -- look at the thread on linux-pm where the wakelock/suspendblocker
> framework has been reviewed, revised, resent repeatedly, etc.
I assume you guys would accept community submitted clean up patches
right? Is there someone maintaining the MSM changes, you maybe?
> The msm7k unfortunately requires a lot of infrastructure to work given
> that the baseband (a black box to us) controls much of the world.
> Last time around when I tried submitting some of the core ipc support
> to talk to it on the lakml, there seemed to be uncertainty about who
> even would review that.
Typically you send stuff to LKML (or other mailing list) for review,
it's not like only one person would be reviewing the code.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists