linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v5] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244702905.5320.9.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:48:25 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as
 per-CPU ring buffer

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:43 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Huang Ying wrote:
> > Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer for better
> > scalability.
> 
> It seems your patch implicitly includes some bug fix for tip/mce3.
> Still discussion of generic lockless ring buffer is going on, so how
> about dividing the patch into 2 pieces, for improvement and for bug fix?
> 
> Maybe improvement part need to be reworked, so I pulled out the bug fix
> part from your patch.
> 
> If it's all right, I'd like to put this on top of tip/mce3 asap.

It is OK for me.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/