[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A30B422.8080109@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:37:06 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: use slab in cpupri_init()
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Li!
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 14:10 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> @@ -163,9 +167,7 @@ int __init_refok cpupri_init(struct cpupri *cp, bool bootmem)
>> so the __init_refok tag can be removed, no?
>
> I am not sure how this is related to my patch but as long as
> init_rootdomain() has it, cpupri_init() should too AFAICT.
>
cpupri_init() is marked as __init_refok, because it calls
alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var() not because init_rootdomain()
has the tag. Now this patch removes this function call,
so the tag is no long needed.
>
>>>
>>> spin_lock_init(&vec->lock);
>>> vec->count = 0;
>>> - if (bootmem)
>>> - alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&vec->mask);
>>> - else if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&vec->mask, GFP_KERNEL))
>>> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&vec->mask, gfp))
>>> goto cleanup;
>>> }
>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists