lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A305F7C.9000308@snapgear.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:35:56 +1000
From:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] headers_check fix patches 20090610

Hi Jaswinder,

Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
> 
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 00:19 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jaswinder,
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:00:30 +0530 Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit e271e1343a94e081723cb4180af3fdb5fecc1a49:
>>>   Ingo Molnar (1):
>>>         Merge branch 'x86/mce4'
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-top.git master
>>>
>>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput (3):
>>>       headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h
>>>       headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h
>>>       headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h
>>>
>>>  arch/m68k/include/asm/swab.h      |    2 +-
>>>  arch/mn10300/include/asm/ptrace.h |    5 ++---
>>>  arch/mn10300/include/asm/setup.h  |    3 ++-
>>>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> Is there some reason that these fixes are not just sent to the appropriate
>> maintainers?  That way we would avoid unnecessary conflicts cropping up.
>>
> 
> Maintainers are also in CC.
> Patches were already sent on :
> 
> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604
> 
> Interested maintainers already pulled and applied patches. These are
> left-over patches. I am sending to Ingo hoping that he will merge it
> otherwise last option for me will be to prepare headers-check tree and
> send to linux-next ;-)

I am happy to take the m68k change and push that upstream.
If it hasn't already been picked up by someone else.

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@...pgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ