linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090611114032.GA8856@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:40:32 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mpm@...enic.com,
	npiggin@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6 
> >   for-linus
> 
> Thanks Pekka for sorting this out - this tree looks nice and it 
> does not conflict with anything we have pending. I started testing 
> it on 6 boxes - if you dont hear from me within a few hours it's 
> all fine.

Hm, with this pulled on a testbox i'm still getting:

[    0.000000] Experimental hierarchical RCU init done.
[    0.000000] NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:256
[    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000] WARNING: at mm/bootmem.c:537 alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem+0x40/0x7e()
[    0.000000] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
[    0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30-tip-02161-g7a74539-dirty #59709
[    0.000000] Call Trace:
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f8c8e>] ? alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem+0x40/0x7e
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff81067168>] warn_slowpath_common+0x88/0xcb
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff810671d2>] warn_slowpath_null+0x27/0x3d
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f8c8e>] alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem+0x40/0x7e
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f9307>] ___alloc_bootmem_nopanic+0x4e/0xec
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f93c5>] ___alloc_bootmem+0x20/0x61
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f962e>] __alloc_bootmem+0x1e/0x34
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823f757c>] early_irq_init+0x6d/0x118
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e0140>] ? early_idt_handler+0x0/0x71
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e0cf7>] start_kernel+0x192/0x394
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e0140>] ? early_idt_handler+0x0/0x71
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e02ad>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xb4/0xcf
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e0000>] ? __init_begin+0x0/0x140
[    0.000000]  [<ffffffff823e0420>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x158/0x17b
[    0.000000] ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
[    0.000000] Fast TSC calibration using PIT
[    0.000000] Detected 2002.510 MHz processor.
[    0.004000] Console: colour VGA+ 80x25

Wasnt this supposed to have gone away with this tree?

Config and full bootlog attached.

	Ingo

View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (62242 bytes)

View attachment "boot.log" of type "text/plain" (242332 bytes)