linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Disable debugging if it increases the minimum page order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244728824.17483.51.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:00:24 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mel@....ul.ie,
	Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Disable debugging if it increases the
 minimum page order

Hi Christoph,

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:43 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> We have had that with SLAB. NO! This leads to the situation that some
> slabs have debug on and some have not. You just do not know which.

I do see your point but surely we don't want to use order 1 allocations
in the fall-back case for kmalloc-4096? Couldn't we just add a printk
saying that debug was disabled for the cache? After all, my patch is
much better than what SLAB does.

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:43 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Note that CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG only enables the code to debug a slab. It does
> not enable debugging for each slab. CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON does that.

True. Larry, do you have CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled or are you passing
SLUB debugging options to the kernel?

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/