[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090611152558.8510.75249.sendpatchset@linux-fd7s.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:26:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>
To: davej@...emonkey.org.uk
Cc: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>,
andreas.herrmann3@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, mark.langsdorf@....com, trenn@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] powernow-k8: fix incorrect value reported in cpuinfo_cur_freq
The "cpuinfo_cur_freq" value reported in /sys is incorrect.
For example, on a 1P quad-core AMD platform (cores: 0,1,2,3) if you want the
"cpuinfo_cur_freq" for core2, you will actually get the value for core0. The
bug is apparent when all the cores are not at the same frequency.
Prior to 2.6.27.8, "cpuinfo_cur_freq" used to return the correct value because
query_current_values_with_pending_wait() obtained the P-state for core2 from
HW, and overwrote the "currpstate" for core0 with it.
However, that got broken with the commit:
a266d9f1253a38ec2d5655ebcd6846298b0554f4
This patch fixes the regression by:
- special-casing the AMD erratum 311 (discussed in the above commit) to AMD
Family 11h processors only
- cleaning up the way powernowk8_get() obtains the per-CPU data
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 31 +++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Thanks,
- naga -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists