[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090611024630.GA24852@louise.pinerecords.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:46:30 +0200
From: Tomáš Szépe <szepe@...erecords.com>
To: gregkh@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.29.x+ FIX] CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK
Hello,
Fix: CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK.
Patch against 2.6.29.*, 2.6.30, current.
inlined please find a trivial fix that makes it possible to run
complete systems out of an initramfs on current kernels again
(this last worked on 2.6.27.*).
--
Tomáš Szépe <szepe@...erecords.com>
diff -urN a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
--- a/fs/Kconfig 2009-06-10 05:05:27 +0200
+++ b/fs/Kconfig 2009-06-11 03:50:50 +0200
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
bool
default n
+source "fs/xfs/Kconfig"
+source "fs/gfs2/Kconfig"
+source "fs/ocfs2/Kconfig"
+source "fs/btrfs/Kconfig"
+
+endif # BLOCK
+
config FILE_LOCKING
bool "Enable POSIX file locking API" if EMBEDDED
default y
@@ -47,13 +54,6 @@
for filesystems like NFS and for the flock() system
call. Disabling this option saves about 11k.
-source "fs/xfs/Kconfig"
-source "fs/gfs2/Kconfig"
-source "fs/ocfs2/Kconfig"
-source "fs/btrfs/Kconfig"
-
-endif # BLOCK
-
source "fs/notify/Kconfig"
source "fs/quota/Kconfig"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists