[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3129E3.3010309@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:59:31 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"chris.mason@...cle.com" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] HWPOISON: fix tasklist_lock/anon_vma locking order
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> To avoid possible deadlock. Proposed by Nick Piggin:
>
> You have tasklist_lock(R) nesting outside i_mmap_lock, and inside anon_vma
> lock. And anon_vma lock nests inside i_mmap_lock.
>
> This seems fragile. If rwlocks ever become FIFO or tasklist_lock changes
> type (maybe -rt kernels do it), then you could have a task holding
> anon_vma lock and waiting for tasklist_lock, and another holding tasklist
> lock and waiting for i_mmap_lock, and another holding i_mmap_lock and
> waiting for anon_vma lock.
>
> CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists