[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244738822.27363.39.camel@violet>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:47:02 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
Hi Linus,
> > so do you expect us to merge stuff like ip, iw, rfkill, crda, the WiMAX
> > tools, the Bluetooth ones and whatever we have that are all have the
> > same issues to be merged into the kernel source code as well.
>
> No. Only stuff that I expect to be really close to hardware, and used for
> kernel purposes.
and where exactly do we draw the line? It is just no clear to me.
> > Also please consider the distro point of view. All these distros have
> > already a hard time to keep up with the kernel patches etc. It is a lot
> > easier to update a userspace package then having to provide a patches
> > kernel source.
>
> Feel free to split it all up if it turns out to be stable later.
>
> But I refuse to go through another oprofile.
Point taken on why you wanna do it. No questions asked here. However I
still think it is a bad idea to begin with. The perf tool could very
well has its own repository on git.kernel.org and be maintained side by
side with the kernel.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists