[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906110952460.3573@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Did you take a look a tools/perf/? There is nothing close to hardware
> at all. It's all pretty highly abstracted away from anything resembling
> the hardware through the perfcounters interface.
The thing is, the raw perfcounters interface isn't going to be useful as
is. And I have seen where things go when you split them up. So when I get
the choice, I'll go down the road of unproven failure, in the hope that it
will be successful, rather than doing the same mistake once more.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over, expecting to get
different results."
And I'm not insane.
Anyway, feel free to disagree. I just don't care.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists