linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0906111005g5e9cd1c7te603bcdb8c6cc921@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:05:02 -0700
From:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig<hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:56:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> No, once a kernel with this syscall gets released we most certainly
>> intend to maintain its ABI.
>
> So what point is there in keeping it in-tree except making life hell for
> packagers?

Packagers are quite used to taking a single source tree and building
multiple packages out of it. This isn't rocket science. It's the
multiple separate trees that need to be released in lock-step that are
headaches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/