linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] first block round for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090611200410.GA11363@kernel.dk>
Date:	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:04:10 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] first block round for 2.6.31

On Thu, Jun 11 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > I pulled from his tree, don't think I ever rebased it.
> 
> I'm pretty sure you did. That's why 
>  (a) you're the committer (because you are)
>  (b) the commits aren't the same when I pull, even though the diffs are.
> 
> Anyway, it's ok to take an occational patch from another tree, but then it 
> needs to be signed off (and no faking of committer data, please) as a 
> cherry-pick, not the way you did it.

I just looked up the offending commits, and you are right. I must have
rebased early on, after having pull some of the patches from Tejun. My
bad, wont repeat!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/