[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090611210810.GA9317@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:08:10 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
>
> So you are saying that only good code comes from including it into
> linux-2.6.git and otherwise you will never get there. Have you actually
> tried to maintain this in a separate repository on kernel.org?
Could you please remind us what the arguments agains including a few
seleted tools within the kernel source tree was.
I ask because I really cannot see why so much nosie is generated?
As a naive user that like easy access to the stuff I work with
this looks like an optimal place to find the kernel-hacking
tools I need. Why should I hunt somewhere else to find it?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists