[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906102332390.30552@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:35:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer: make the buffer a true circular link
list
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether these 4 lines:
> bpage = list_entry(pages.next, struct buffer_page, list);
> list_del_init(&bpage->list);
> cpu_buffer->pages = &bpage->list;
>
> list_splice(&pages, cpu_buffer->pages);
> equal to these 2 lines:
> cpu_buffer->pages = pages.next;
> list_del(&pages);
>
> If there are equivalent, I think the second one
> are simpler. It may be not a really necessarily cleanup.
>
> What I asked is: if there are equivalent, could you use these two line:
> cpu_buffer->pages = pages.next;
> list_del(&pages);
OK, now I understand.
Hmm, that may be so. I'll have to look deeper at that.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists