[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244797659.30512.37.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:07:39 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...e.de
Subject: Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence
Hi Ben,
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 18:53 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Yes, you're obviously right. I overlooked the fact that arch code have
> > their own special slab_is_available() heuristics (yikes!).
> >
> > But are you happy with the two patches I posted so I can push them to
> > Linus?
>
> I won't be able to test them until tomorrow. However, I think the first
> one becomes unnecessary with the second one applied (provided you didn't
> miss a case), no ?
OK, I am dropping the slub/slab patch from the queue for now. Here's
what I am going to push to Linus:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=topic/slab/earlyboot
So I am sending the GFP_NOWAIT conversion for boot code even though you
didn't seem to like it (but didn't explicitly NAK) as it fixes problems
on x86.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists