[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090612091457.GF24044@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:57 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:05:33PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 18:53 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Now, if you find it a bit too ugly, feel free to rename smellybits to
> > something else and create an accessor function for setting what bits are
> > masked out, but I still believe that the basic idea behind my patch is
> > saner than yours :-)
>
> It's not the naming I object to but the mechanism because I think is
> open for abuse (think smelly driver playing tricks with it). So I do
> think my patch is the sanest solution here. ;-)
>
> Nick? Christoph?
I like less overhead of Ben's approach, and I like the slab
allocator being told about this rather than having to deduce
it from that horrible system_state thing.
OTOH, I don't know if it is useful, and is it just to work
around the problem of slab allocators unconditionally doing
the local_irq_enable? Or is it going to be more widely
useful?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists