[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090612112900.4435f70f@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:29:00 +0200
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Rob Emanuele <poorarm@...reis.com>,
Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>,
Joey Oravec <joravec@...wtech.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Fix] New Unified AVR32/AT91 MCI Driver that supports
both MCI slots used at the same time
Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Well, what is the best way to differentiate it from the at91_mci
> > driver and keep users from trying to use both drivers?
>
> I propose that we setup a kind of choice sub menu in the Kconfig for
> those two drivers when they are both supported.
Shouldn't it be enough to simply add
depends on !THE_OTHER_DRIVER
to both of them?
Btw, what are the long-term plans for this? Should the at91_mci driver
be phased out once the atmel-mci driver supports all at91 and avr32
devices?
> > Who would that be as I haven't seen anyone who maintains any of those
> > boards other than the at91rm8200 (at least nothing listed in the
> > MAINTAINERS file)? The board-sam9g20ek.c platform only shows Atmel as
> > the most recent copyright.
>
> Hey, AT91 are very well maintained, SAM9 as well as at91rm9200.
> So, AT91 specific bits should be sent to this mailing-list with Andrew
> Victor in copy.
> I will also certainly add comments on this code.
One of you should update MAINTAINERS to reflect this.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists