[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <004001c9eb53$71991300$54cb3900$@rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:46:37 +0200
From: Stefan Lankes <lankes@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
To: 'Andi Kleen' <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com,
linux-numa@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Bierbaum <boris@...s.rwth-aachen.de>,
'Brice Goglin' <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4]: affinity-on-next-touch
> > I analyze Lee Schermerhorn's migrate memory on cpu migration patches
> > (http://free.linux.hp.com/~lts/Patches/PageMigration/). I think that
> Lee
> > Schermerhorn add similar functionalities to the kernel. He called the
> > "affinity-on-next-touch" functionality "migrate_on_fault" and uses in
> his
> > patches the normal NUMA memory policies. Therefore, his solution fits
> better
> > to the Linux kernel. I tested his patches with our test applications
> and got
> > nearly the same performance results.
>
> That's great to know.
>
> I didn't think he had a per process setting though, did he?
He enables the support of migration-on-fault via cpusets (echo 1 >
/dev/cpuset/migrate_on_fault).
Afterwards, every process could initiate migration-on-fault via mbind(...,
MPOL_MF_MOVE|MPOL_MF_LAZY).
> > I found only patches for the kernel 2.6.25-rc2-mm1. Does someone
> develop
> > these patches further?
>
> Not to much knowledge. Maybe Lee will pick them up again now that there
> are more use cases.
>
> If he doesn't have time maybe you could update them?
We are planning to work in this area. I think that I could update these
patches.
At least, I am able to support Lee.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists