[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020906120657j31fb3e82t2da251d31db6ba92@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:57:04 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline
Hi Linus,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Vegard Nossum<vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree;
>
> kmemcheck is a feature which can (at run-time) detect some uses of
> uninitialized memory within the kernel, similarly to what Valgrind's memcheck
> does for userspace programs. We also have the ability to find use-after-free
> errors and leaks of uninitialized data to userspace, both with a false-
> positive rate of zero.
>
> kmemcheck is self-contained in the sense that when CONFIG_KMEMCHECK=n, it has
> no effect on the compiled kernel whatsoever. Our code has lived in the -tip
> tree and been in -next for over a year, and has the acks of x86 and slab
> maintainers (Ingo and Pekka). Inclusion in mainline would lower the threshold
> for building and running kmemcheck-enabled kernels, which would also
> hopefully increase testing coverage of the rest of the kernel code.
I hope I didn't burn all my karma for this merge window with the slab
early boot patches but:
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
for this pull request.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists