[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906120923.02851.lkml@morethan.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:00 -0500
From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
To: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Tomaz Mertelj <tomaz.mertelj@...st.arnes.si>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Add driver for VIA CPU core temperature
On Fri June 12 2009, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Fri June 12 2009, Harald Welte wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 06:46:45AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > > > Temperature values are supposed to be expressed in millidegrees C, not
> > > > degrees C as it seems to be doing (although 25 degrees C seems pretty
> > > > low for a CPU temperature?) The drivers needs to multiply values by
> > > > 1000 before exporting them to sysfs. Then "sensors" will report the
> > > > correct temperature value.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah, 25 degrees C is room temperature - real hard for the junction temperature
> > > to be 25 degrees C with power applied; lacking an infinitely perfect heatsink.
> > >
> > > Look for an "off by one" error in shifting or masking the value.
> >
> > there is no shifting and the masking is 0xffffffff :)
> >
> > it might be that the BIOS is doing something wrong when programming the
> > calibration MSR's at early botoup. I would need the contents of MSR
> > 0x1160 ... 0x116C as well as 0x1152 and 0x1153 to be able to determine that.
> >
>
> root@...1:~# for r in 0x1160 0x1161 0x1162 0x1163 0x1164 0x1165 0x1166 0x1167 0x1168 0x1169 0x116a 0x116b 0x116c 0x1152 0x1153 ; do ./rdmsr $r ; done
> MSR register 0x1160 => 08:04:98:10:b7:ef:8f:f4
> MSR register 0x1161 => 08:04:98:10:b7:fb:af:f4
> MSR register 0x1162 => 08:04:98:10:b7:ec:ff:f4
> MSR register 0x1163 => 08:04:98:10:b7:fa:cf:f4
> MSR register 0x1164 => 08:04:98:10:b7:f4:cf:f4
> MSR register 0x1165 => 08:04:98:10:b7:f3:2f:f4
> MSR register 0x1166 => 08:04:98:10:b7:f1:7f:f4
> MSR register 0x1167 => 08:04:98:10:b7:f2:0f:f4
> MSR register 0x1168 => 08:04:98:10:b7:ef:0f:f4
> MSR register 0x1169 => 08:04:98:10:b7:fc:8f:f4
> MSR register 0x116a => 08:04:98:10:b7:ef:8f:f4
> MSR register 0x116b => 08:04:98:10:b7:f8:bf:f4
> MSR register 0x116c => 08:04:98:10:b7:f9:df:f4
> MSR register 0x1152 => 08:04:98:10:b7:ed:5f:f4
> MSR register 0x1153 => 08:04:98:10:b7:ed:cf:f4
>
> The high 32b look strange in that output - might be
> the utility I used (attached).
>
Yes - that utility had problems with casting the address;
I think I fixed that, this looks better:
root@...1:~# for r in 0x1160 0x1161 0x1162 0x1163 0x1164 0x1165 0x1166 0x1167 0x1168 0x1169 0x116a 0x116b 0x116c 0x1152 0x1153 ; do ./rdmsrll $r ; done
MSR register 0x1160 => 08:04:83:94:bf:86:e1:d8
MSR register 0x1161 => 08:04:83:94:bf:ec:73:78
MSR register 0x1162 => 08:04:83:94:bf:bf:4b:58
MSR register 0x1163 => 08:04:83:94:bf:bc:82:28
MSR register 0x1164 => 08:04:83:94:bf:b1:1d:98
MSR register 0x1165 => 08:04:83:94:bf:cb:09:88
MSR register 0x1166 => 08:04:83:94:bf:d0:03:e8
MSR register 0x1167 => 08:04:83:94:bf:91:26:18
MSR register 0x1168 => 08:04:83:94:bf:99:26:38
MSR register 0x1169 => 08:04:83:94:bf:b3:f1:08
MSR register 0x116a => 08:04:83:94:bf:d5:42:88
MSR register 0x116b => 08:04:83:94:bf:f8:b6:28
MSR register 0x116c => 08:04:83:94:bf:f6:68:88
MSR register 0x1152 => 08:04:83:94:bf:d5:b4:f8
MSR register 0x1153 => 08:04:83:94:bf:bd:d5:28
Mike
> Mike
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists