[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64bb37e0906120751u14cac347hfa2356372e1e0a6a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:51:01 +0200
From: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, hancockrwd@...il.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
bharrosh@...asas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: disable DMA_API_DEBUG for now
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:38:47PM +0200, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>> DMA-API: device driver tries to free DM
>> A memory it has not allocated [device address=0x000000011e4c3000]
>> [size=4096 bytes]
>
> Hmm, looking again over the code I've seen that the ref
> dma_debug_entries are not alway filled with all necessary information
> for best-fit. Can you please try if you still get false warnings when
> you apply the two patches attached instead of the one I sent yesterday?
Hmm... There isn't a get_nr_mapped_entries() in 2.6.30.
Are these patches again the current linus tree?
For unfilled information I wanted to complain that for non-sg mapping
sg_call_ents never gets filled. But as dma_entry_alloc() does a
memset() to clean the entrys it should not matter.
And what about dma_debug_entry.paddr? Should this also be compared?
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists