[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090612164503.GA23608@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:45:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> >
> > Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree;
>
> No.
>
> This seems to be 99% merges o fother branches.
>
> I'm no longer pulling from people who can't keep their branches
> clean and develop without pulling from me every other day, or
> pulling from other random branches. If it gets that many
> conflicts, I just don't want to see it - there's something
> seriously wrong with it.
>
> And if you just merge for some random reason, I don't want to pull
> it either.
>
> So in either case, I'm not pulling this.
>
> Just _look_ at that gitk thing. It has several stretches of just
> "Merge branch 'linus' into kmemcheck". WITH NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT
> IN BETWEEN!
This is an ancient one year old tree :-/
Vegard, i suspect you are best off by creating a clean, rebased
(same-content) series linear tree out of the patches - with all
fixes backmerged and there being a good logical order of patches.
Since it will be same-content it should be doable in short order. I
can do it too if you dont have the time.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists