[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090613134922.GA23433@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:49:22 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] cpumask: Use accessors for cpu_*_mask: arm
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:25:12PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:33:03 am Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:33:14PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
> > > are const).
> >
> > Please check linux-next - there are all kinds of SMP changes currently
> > queued up in the ARM tree, which include most of the updates for things
> > like this.
>
> OK, here's the revision based on latest linux-next, if you wouldn't mind
> taking it. (We should really make on_each_cpu_mask an arch-indep, too).
Hmm, weird. Your diff is against does not correspond with my tree, which
supposedly is in linux-next.
Commit 8266810 "[ARM] smp: fix cpumask usage in ARM SMP code" (in my tree
since May 17th) fixes some of the areas which your patch touches. See:
http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-2.6-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/smp
I suggest hanging fire on this until the ARM tree is merged into mainline.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists