[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18995.11516.586276.479986@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:37:16 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open
when supported
Ingo Molnar writes:
> PMU support is not required to get perfcounters support: if an
> architecture hooks up the syscall it will get generic software
> counters and the tools will work as well.
It looks to me that to work properly, each architecture has to provide
set_perf_counter_pending() and some way to arrange to call
perf_counter_do_pending() once interrupts get re-enabled. We need
this because some software counters (the context-switch counter at
least, as well as all the tracepoint counters) use nmi = 1 because
their events happen at times when we can't do a wakeup.
Actually, as far as the tracepoints are concerned, I can't see any
reason to be sure that interrupts will be disabled when a tracepoint
event occurs. On powerpc, calling set_perf_counter_pending() when
interrupts are enabled won't result in perf_counter_do_pending()
getting called right away; the perf_counter_do_pending() call won't
happen until something disables and re-enables interrupts.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists