linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/27] score arch files for linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFFDE0B66A.CCDF7360-ON482575D4.0024FAC6-482575D4.00260499@sunplusct.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:50:47 +0800
From:	liqin.chen@...plusct.com
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] score arch files for linux

Hi Arnd,

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> 写于 2009-06-10 02:19:06:

> On Tuesday 09 June 2009, liqin.chen@...plusct.com wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Andrew Morton and linus,
> > 
> > According to your comment on score arch code, 
> > we update score code base on asm-generic#next repository.
> > use arch microblaze and blackfin as reference.
> 
> Ok, just finished looking over the patches and I am generally
> very happy about their quality, it usually takes much longer
> for a submission of this size to get into a mergeable shape.
> 
> The only thing that I think needs to be fixed before a
> 2.6.31 release is my comment about unistd.h still containing
> the __ARCH_WANT_SYSCALL_* #defines. I consider that my fault
> because I did not make it clear enough what those are meant
> for in asm-generic/unistd.h.
> 
> One more general thought: I noticed that you split the header
> files by alphabetical ordering. While there is no good way to
> split a set of interdependent files, a logical grouping
> (e.g. ABI, memory management, device, cpu) would be nice.
> 
> Everything else I found are only polite suggestions of what
> can still be improved, not issues that I think need to
> be addressed immediately. I especially love how the work
> that Remis and I put into the generic header files starts
> paying off, because it makes reviewing an architecture so
> much simpler.
> 
> Please add my 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>'
> to your patches.
> 

Based on your comments, I use asm-generic/current.h, hardirq.h,
unaligned.h etc instead of files under arch/include/asm folder.
It could work in score code.

Best Regards
Liqin
--