linux-kernel - Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090613003016.GB20442@fluff.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:30:16 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, swetland@...gle.com,
	pavel@....cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, san@...roid.com,
	rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:24:45PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:15:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:38 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:00:30AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > > > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:49:12 +0100
> > > > 
> > > > > I can not keep up with the number of patches that need to be
> > > > > reviewed and ultimately merged.  I know this, and I freely admit it,
> > > > > and I have done so on many occasions.
> > > > 
> > > > Then split up the responsibilities to other people instead of being
> > > > the choke point.  Controlling everything isn't so important.
> > > 
> > > Don't you think that I've been trying to get other people to be more
> > > involved?
> > > 
> > > - I've been pushing people to send patches to the relevent mailing
> > >   list(s) and maintainer(s) for years.
> > > 
> > > - I've been pushing people to send their ARM patches to the ARM
> > >   mailing list rather than directly into the patch system for review
> > >   (it even has a comment telling people this) so that others can get
> > >   involved in reviewing them, and sharing that work load.
> > > 
> > > Do you think either have been anywhere near successful?
> > []
> > > I've been trying to get greater participation
> > > but it's just not happening.
> > 
> > I suggest you stop using subscriber-only mailing lists and
> > use linux-arm@...r.kernel.org.
> 
> This is main point here is to offload Russell.
> One way to offload Russell is to have competent people reviewing platform
> code for ARM. This is best done by other platform people.
> Me and you - we can helpt. But the people where we need higher
> involvement are already on the list.

Personally, I'm not on linux-arm@...r.kernel.org and don't plan on
being there either. If people are too stupid to read the maintainers
entry and realise that linux-arm-kernel is moderated and they might
thus have to subscribe to post there then they can be safely ignored.

-- 
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/