[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A34F9D8.5040306@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:23:36 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v10] kvm: add support for irqfd
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I think Avi asked for this specific feature during review which is the
>> reason why its there today. However, I agree that it would probably be
>> a good idea to put an upper limit on the number of supported aliases
>> that can be registered. Will fix.
>>
>> Thanks Michael,
>>
>> -Greg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Avi, can you elaborate on why do we want to map multiple fds
> to the same gsi? I think it's better to allow a 1:1 mapping
> only: if many processes want to trigger interrupts they can
> all write to the same fd.
>
I don't want to assume that the eventfds all come from the same source.
That said, we have a workaround, allocate a new gsi with the same routes
and attach the excess eventfds there.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists