linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:46:03 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, devicetree-discuss@...abs.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Well, I assume that issues regarding checkpatch do not have the highest
> > priority (especially while the merge-window is open), which is understandable.
> 
> Hm, the "merge-window" for new stuff like these patches is pretty much
> already closed, as you didn't send them _before_ the merge window opened
> up.  You need to get them to us sooner, so we can test stuff out in the
> -next tree for a while before we can merge them.

Seems you got me wrong here :)

As I stated in the introduction ("PATCH [0/2]"), this patch series is _not_
meant for the current merge-window. I just happened to be done with it now.

With the above sentence I just wanted to give a hint, why there was not a reply
to my checkpatch-mail (as Hans seemed to be concerned about that there was
none).

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)