[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090614214603.GA24323@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:46:03 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, devicetree-discuss@...abs.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Well, I assume that issues regarding checkpatch do not have the highest
> > priority (especially while the merge-window is open), which is understandable.
>
> Hm, the "merge-window" for new stuff like these patches is pretty much
> already closed, as you didn't send them _before_ the merge window opened
> up. You need to get them to us sooner, so we can test stuff out in the
> -next tree for a while before we can merge them.
Seems you got me wrong here :)
As I stated in the introduction ("PATCH [0/2]"), this patch series is _not_
meant for the current merge-window. I just happened to be done with it now.
With the above sentence I just wanted to give a hint, why there was not a reply
to my checkpatch-mail (as Hans seemed to be concerned about that there was
none).
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists