[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090615074616.GD18638@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:46:17 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, hancockrwd@...il.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
bharrosh@...asas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: disable DMA_API_DEBUG for now
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:08:01PM +0200, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:38:47PM +0200, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >> DMA-API: device driver tries to free DM
> >> A memory it has not allocated [device address=0x000000011e4c3000]
> >> [size=4096 bytes]
> >
> > Hmm, looking again over the code I've seen that the ref
> > dma_debug_entries are not alway filled with all necessary information
> > for best-fit. Can you please try if you still get false warnings when
> > you apply the two patches attached instead of the one I sent yesterday?
>
> I tested these patches
> (0001-dma-debug-check-for-sg_call_ents-in-best-fit-algorit.patch and
> 0002-dma-debug-be-more-careful-when-building-reference-en.patch)
> against 2.6.30-git6 and did not see any warnings.
>
> I can't be 100% sure about the fix, because I do not have a reliable
> trigger, but it looks quite good.
Ok cool, I will push these two patches upstream then and will send them
to -stable too. So we get this fixed in a 30.x release too. Thanks a lot
for your testing.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists