linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090615082636.GA30964@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:26:36 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	yinghai@...nel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:18:31AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:16:30PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > 
> > I dropped the GFP_WAIT conversion patch and added the gfp masking patch 
> > you liked. I tested this on x86-64 with both SLAB and SLUB.
> 
> Hi Pekka,
> 
> I tried to convert some of the early allocations on s390. Some callsites
> however need to have the GFP_DMA flag, since we need to allocate memory below
> 2GB. Passing GFP_DMA causes this crash:
> 
>     <1>Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address fffffffffffff000
>     <4>Oops: 0038 [#1] PREEMPT SMP 
>     <4>Modules linked in:
>     <4>CPU: 0 Not tainted 2.6.30-03984-g45e3e19-dirty #233
>     <4>Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 00000000006a2ef0, ksp: 0000000000718000)
>     <4>Krnl PSW : 0700100180000000 00000000000808ee (queue_work_on+0x8e/0xe0)
>     <4>           R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:0 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:1 PM:0 EA:3
>     <4>Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 00000000006b8b88
>     <4>           00000000006b8b88 0000000000000001 0000000000000008 0000000000000200
>     <4>           000000003fe28000 0000000000008001 00000000011da730 0000000000717ca0
>     <4>           00000000006b8b88 0000000000488650 0000000000717cd0 0000000000717ca0
>     <4>Krnl Code: 00000000000808de: e310d0000082        xg      %r1,0(%r13)
>     <4>           00000000000808e4: eb220003000d        sllg    %r2,%r2,3
>     <4>           00000000000808ea: b9040034            lgr     %r3,%r4
>     <4>          >00000000000808ee: e32210000004        lg      %r2,0(%r2,%r1)
>     <4>           00000000000808f4: c0e5ffffff28        brasl   %r14,80744
>     <4>           00000000000808fa: a7280001            lhi     %r2,1
>     <4>           00000000000808fe: e340b0b80004        lg      %r4,184(%r11)
>     <4>           0000000000080904: b9140022            lgfr    %r2,%r2
>     <4>Call Trace:
>     <4>([<000000003fe28000>] 0x3fe28000)
>     <4> [<0000000000080e96>] queue_work+0x62/0xa4
>     <4> [<0000000000080f26>] schedule_work+0x4e/0x60
>     <4> [<0000000000132f7e>] dma_kmalloc_cache+0x1ca/0x1d0
>     <4> [<00000000001330ae>] get_slab+0x12a/0x130
>     <4> [<00000000001337b6>] __kmalloc+0x5e/0x364
>     <4> [<0000000000739132>] con3215_init+0x1c2/0x2e4
>     <4> [<00000000007333ea>] console_init+0x42/0x5c
>     <4> [<0000000000718e50>] start_kernel+0x53c/0x6b8
>     <4> [<0000000000012020>] _ehead+0x20/0x80
> 
> I didn't look any deeper into this, but looks to me like doing something like
> schedule_work() this early isn't ok.
> 
> This is the conversion that leads to the crash:
> 
> -               alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(struct raw3215_info));
> +               kzalloc(sizeof(struct raw3215_info), GFP_NOWAIT | GFP_DMA);
> 
> Might be that I missed something. Maybe some special flag?

No, just a bug in the conversion.

If you predicate the schedule_work call on slab_state == SYSFS, then
it should work (when sysfs comes up later in init, previously added
slabs will be registered with sysfs).

Oh, and you'd need to also not pass __SYSFS_ADD_DEFERRED into
kmem_cache_create in that case too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/