[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A360793.6060000@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:34:27 +0800
From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch BUGFIX] kcore: fix its wrong size on x86_64
Hi Amerigo,
The wrong number I mean is 131941393240064.
So do you think
[root@...t3 ~]# ls -l /proc/kcore
-r-------- 1 root root 131941393240064 Jun 15 13:39 /proc/kcore
is better than
[taoma@...t2 ~]$ ll /proc/kcore
-r-------- 1 root root 281474974617600 Jun 15 15:20 /proc/kcore
?
I don't think so.
Actually the right result should look like
[root@...t8 ~]# ls -l /proc/kcore
-r-------- 1 root root 5301604352 Jun 15 13:35 /proc/kcore
And with your patch I can't get this number.
Regards,
Tao
Amerigo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:59:08PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>> Hi Amerigo,
>> Just patched my kernel and tested.
>> The bad news is that although the number is changed, but it isn't right
>> either.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> What do you mean by saying it isn't right? You think it is wrong only because
> it is more than phy mem size?
>
> Again, the document of /proc/kcore is wrong, it _can_ be more than phy mem size.
>
> Regards.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists