[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3608F9.20203@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:40:25 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] x86, mce: call-in should be after updating global_nwo
huang ying wrote:
> 2009/6/15 Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>:
>> At the beginning of Monarch synchronization, processors wait until
>> all of them have entered the exception handler and then check the
>> global_nwo to determine if any of them saw a fatal event.
>>
>> However since current code does call-in before updating global_nwo,
>> it might happen that the global_nwo does not reflect some of local
>> nwo at the time. This might break printing corrected errors not
>> handled yet on panic.
>
> This is almost same as the patch that I just posted. I think this is
> because it trigger a failure in mce-test suite, and we both find the
> failure.
That's right.
> But your patch lacks memory barrier between mce_callin and global_nwo
> updating/reading. Atomic operations does not imply memory barrier.
You are right. I agree that your patch is better fix.
It seems my patch includes cleanup for mce_start(), so I'll extract it
and make another patch soon.
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists