linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] msm_serial: serial driver for MSM7K onboard serial peripheral.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a55d774e0906150255h781f7677w9d336257c89200fc@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:55:15 -0700
From:	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Love <rlove@...gle.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] msm_serial: serial driver for MSM7K onboard 
	serial peripheral.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Pavel Machek<pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Otherwise seems to be okay (plus the issues someone pointed in other
> email), you can add my acked-by:. I guess you should submit it to
> rmk's patch system...

Russell,

Do you want this stuff to end up in the patch system, or would
accumulating patches into a for-rmk git branch somewhere make sense?
That seemed to work reasonably well last time around.  I'm happy to do
either, but am most comfortable working with git.

Does that even make sense for stuff like the serial driver or should
everything outside of arch/arm/... be going through various different
subsystem maintainers?

Thanks,

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/