| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200906151602.42873.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:02:42 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> Cc: liqin.chen@...plusct.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add EMAXERRNO On Monday 15 June 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:30:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Some architectures want to flag error returns from a syscall based on > > the return value. The range from zero to -511 is for errors that > > we can return to user space, so add a #define for this to > > include/asm-generic/errno.h. > > I thought we could return anything up to -4095. Sort of, yes. Internally to the kernel, we use anything up to 4095, that's e.g. IS_ERR_VALUE checks for. Error numbers from 512 to 4095 are internal and should never be seen by the user. In reality, it probably does not matter at all because we know what error numbers we use. Now that you pointed me to include/linux/err.h, that already defines MAX_ERRNO. Liqin, I think I'd prefer to just drop my patch again, and you can use MAX_ERRNO, which is defined in err.h. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists