[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090615170655.GF25040@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:06:55 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
san@...roid.com, rlove@...gle.com, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support
> > Actually I agree with Brian here, this is better done at kernel level.
> >
> > OTOH, at least initially, it does not need to be done at all. It will
> > make battery readings less reliable but hey... the battery meter does
> > not work reliably anyway and estimating capacity left from voltage
> > acceptably on other platforms...
>
> I'd agree. This stuff can wait until the core support is solid. I'd
> fight harder for conditional support for wakelocks since that has a
> much bigger impact on battery life (being able to know when it's safe
> to power collapse in idle, etc), whereas this just improves the
> accuracy of the battery gauging.
Yes, wakelocks are more important than battery gauging... but they
need core support :-(; and they can wait, too.
Getting serial support & board-dream upstream are very good first
steps (thanks!). I'm currently trying to get 2.6.30 + your series of 3
+ framebuffer changes to boot.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists