| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1245088797-29533-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:59:51 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Make sure blocks are properly allocated under mmaped page even when blocksize < pagesize
In a situation like:
truncate(f, 1024);
a = mmap(f, 0, 4096);
a[0] = 'a';
truncate(f, 4096);
we end up with a dirty page which does not have all blocks allocated /
reserved. Fix the problem by using new VFS infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
fs/ext4/inode.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 2593f74..764c394 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3073,7 +3073,7 @@ static void ext4_falloc_update_inode(struct inode *inode,
*/
if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) {
if (new_size > i_size_read(inode))
- i_size_write(inode, new_size);
+ block_extend_i_size(inode, new_size, 0);
if (new_size > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize)
ext4_update_i_disksize(inode, new_size);
}
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 875db94..3cad61b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ static int ext4_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
from = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
to = from + len;
-
+ block_lock_hole_extend(inode, pos);
retry:
handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, needed_blocks);
if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
@@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ retry:
if (ret == -ENOSPC && ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries))
goto retry;
out:
+ if (ret)
+ block_unlock_hole_extend(inode);
return ret;
}
@@ -1735,6 +1737,7 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(struct file *file,
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
+ block_unlock_hole_extend(inode);
if (pos + len > inode->i_size)
/* if we have allocated more blocks and copied
* less. We will have blocks allocated outside
@@ -2909,6 +2912,7 @@ static int ext4_da_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
"dev %s ino %lu pos %llu len %u flags %u",
inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino,
(unsigned long long) pos, len, flags);
+ block_lock_hole_extend(inode, pos);
retry:
/*
* With delayed allocation, we don't log the i_disksize update
@@ -2951,6 +2955,8 @@ retry:
if (ret == -ENOSPC && ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries))
goto retry;
out:
+ if (ret)
+ block_unlock_hole_extend(inode);
return ret;
}
@@ -3496,7 +3502,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
loff_t end = offset + ret;
if (end > inode->i_size) {
ei->i_disksize = end;
- i_size_write(inode, end);
+ block_extend_i_size(inode, offset, ret);
/*
* We're going to return a positive `ret'
* here due to non-zero-length I/O, so there's
@@ -3541,6 +3547,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations ext4_ordered_aops = {
.sync_page = block_sync_page,
.write_begin = ext4_write_begin,
.write_end = ext4_ordered_write_end,
+ .extend_i_size = block_extend_i_size,
.bmap = ext4_bmap,
.invalidatepage = ext4_invalidatepage,
.releasepage = ext4_releasepage,
@@ -3556,6 +3563,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations ext4_writeback_aops = {
.sync_page = block_sync_page,
.write_begin = ext4_write_begin,
.write_end = ext4_writeback_write_end,
+ .extend_i_size = block_extend_i_size,
.bmap = ext4_bmap,
.invalidatepage = ext4_invalidatepage,
.releasepage = ext4_releasepage,
@@ -3571,6 +3579,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations ext4_journalled_aops = {
.sync_page = block_sync_page,
.write_begin = ext4_write_begin,
.write_end = ext4_journalled_write_end,
+ .extend_i_size = block_extend_i_size,
.set_page_dirty = ext4_journalled_set_page_dirty,
.bmap = ext4_bmap,
.invalidatepage = ext4_invalidatepage,
@@ -3586,6 +3595,7 @@ static const struct address_space_operations ext4_da_aops = {
.sync_page = block_sync_page,
.write_begin = ext4_da_write_begin,
.write_end = ext4_da_write_end,
+ .extend_i_size = block_extend_i_size,
.bmap = ext4_bmap,
.invalidatepage = ext4_da_invalidatepage,
.releasepage = ext4_releasepage,
@@ -5433,6 +5443,12 @@ int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
/*
+ * Wait for extending of i_size, after this moment, next truncate /
+ * write can create holes under us but they writeprotect our page so
+ * we'll be called again to fill the hole.
+ */
+ block_wait_on_hole_extend(inode, page_offset(page));
+ /*
* Get i_alloc_sem to stop truncates messing with the inode. We cannot
* get i_mutex because we are already holding mmap_sem.
*/
--
1.6.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists