[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A369F3F.5060600@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:21:35 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
vegard.nossum@...il.com, efault@....de, jeremy@...p.org,
npiggin@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: Fix call-chain support
to use NMI-safe methods
On 06/15/2009 10:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> But one thing is sure: it is certainly going to be faster than the
>> INVLPG(s!) we have to do with the GUP solution.
>>
>
> Sure, but we only pay that price when we do the callchain bit, not on
> every NMI.
>
You can read cr2 on nmi entry and nmi exit, and only write it if it has
changed (if it turns out that writing cr2 is expensive; ISTR that it isn't).
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists