| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:47:35 -0400 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...badil.infradead.org> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, tshibata@...jp.nec.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Documentation: add documentation for rc-series and merge window On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:19:34PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 04:12:51PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > This is losely based on previous discussions on linux-kernel [1][2]. > > > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122048427801324&w=2 > > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122048757705315&w=2 > > > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com> > > --- > > > > I have run into issues when trying to explain this and policies > > for the rc-series, it seems there is no place that documents this > > clearly so here is an attempt based on some previous discussions. > > Not sure if I got it all correct, so feedback is welcomed. I do think > > clarifying this a little should help. > > > > I was also not sure if Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt is the best > > splace for this as well, please let me know. > > I don't think this is the best place for it, as the stable_* file is for > describing the rules for the 2.6.x.y releases, not the main 2.6.x > releases. > > A new file perhaps? Or an addition to the > Documentation/development-process/ book? OK here is that, with Pavel's changes taken into consideration. From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: add documentation summary for rc-series and merge window This is losely based on previous discussions on linux-kernel [1][2]. Lets also refer people reading the stable rules to Documentation/development-process/. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122048427801324&w=2 [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122048757705315&w=2 Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com> --- Documentation/development-process/2.Process | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt | 5 ++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/development-process/2.Process b/Documentation/development-process/2.Process index d750321..e023db6 100644 --- a/Documentation/development-process/2.Process +++ b/Documentation/development-process/2.Process @@ -7,6 +7,72 @@ course of one year, the kernel has since had to evolve a number of processes to keep development happening smoothly. A solid understanding of how the process works is required in order to be an effective part of it. +2.0 SUMMARY + +This section provides a brief summary of the new kernel release rules. + +2.0.0 NEW KERNEL RELEASE RULES + +Stable kernels are released when they are ready! This means there are +absolutely no strict guidelines for sticking to specific dates for a +kernel release. + +2.0.1 MERGE WINDOW + +The merge window opens up after the next stable kernel is released. +The merge window is when maintainers of different subsystem send pull +requests to Linus for code they have been queuing up for the next +stable kernel. This is typically now done through respective +foo-next-2.6.git trees where foo is your subsystem. Each maintainer +queues up patches for the next kernel cycle in this foo-next-2.6.git +tree. After the merge window the kernel is worked on through the +rc-series of the kernel release. + +After a maintainer has sent his pull request to Linus during the merge +window no further new development will be accepted for that tree and +as such it marks the closure of development for that subsystem for that +kernel cycle. Developers wishing to target deadlines should simply work +on their development without regards or consideration for inclusion to +a specific kernel release. Once development is done it should simply be +posted. If you insist on targeting a kernel release for deadlines you can +try to be aware of the current rc cycle development and how soon it seems +the next stable kernel release will be made. When Linus notes the last rc +cycle released may be the last -- that is a good sign you should already +have all your development done and merged in the respective development +tree. If your code is not ready and merged into the respective maintainers +tree prior to the announced last potential rc kernel release chances are +you missed getting your code in for the next kernel merge window. +Exemptions here are new drivers, covered below. + +2.0.2 RC-SERIES RULES + +Rules on what kind of patches are accepted after the merge window closes. +These are patches targeted for the kernel rc-series of a kernel prior +to its release. + + - it must fix a reported regression + - if must fix a reported security hole + - if must fix a reported oops/kernel hang + +This means any small-non-fix code changes, although they might fix an issue, +will not be accepted. If the patch in question is for a driver that has been +around for more than a kernel release, then "small fixes" really can't be +worth all that much. And "small fixes" may be small and "obvious" they +definitely can regress. + +2.0.3 RC-SERIES NEW DRIVER EXEMPTION RULE + +The very first release a new driver (or filesystem) is special. New drivers +are accepted during the rc series. Patches for the same driver then are +also accepted during the same rc series of a kernel as well as fixes as it +cannot regress as no previous kernels exists with it. + +Once drivers are upstream for one kernel release (say on 2.6.29) the target +*goal* after the merge window of the next kernel (respectively this would be +the 2.6.30 rc-series) is to address regressions. Kernel oops/hangs and security +issues are obviously accepted but the point is these should have also been +caught earlier as a general development goal. The rc-series focus should really +be to address regressions. 2.1: THE BIG PICTURE diff --git a/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt b/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt index a452227..113e8c8 100644 --- a/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt +++ b/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux 2.6 -stable releases. +For further details, such as stable kernel release schedules, rc-series +policies and process of development please refer to: + +Documentation/development-process/ + Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the "-stable" tree: -- 1.6.2.2.446.gfbdc0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists