[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245138364.3415.39.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:46:03 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in mm/slub.c
> > > between commit 964cf35c88f93b4927dbc4e950dfa4d880c7f9d1 ("SLUB: Fix early
> > > boot GFP_DMA allocations") from the slab tree and commit
> > > 18fd427debcf37c06917b55295df682fd05fee76 ("slub: add hooks for
> > > kmemcheck") from the tip tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >
> > Looks good! Thanks.
>
> Btw., this SLAB commit is for this merge window, right?
Yes, it's a fix for SLUB that's going to be part of the next pull
request (probably out today or tomorrow).
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists