[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906160216.29537.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:16:28 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on my aging Thinkpad T42p resume from hibernation
> fails in 2.6.30. There is a backtrace on suspend prior
> to writing out the disk image, but I cannot capture
> it due to lack of a serial port on the T42p. On
> resume the machine is dead after reading the image
> from disk.
>
> I've bisected this to:
>
> commit 01599fca6758d2cd133e78f87426fc851c9ea725
> Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Mon Apr 13 10:27:49 2009 -0700
>
> cpufreq: use smp_call_function_[single|many]() in acpi-cpufreq.c
>
> I see in git log that this commit is known broken, but the
> resume on my machine is still broken in 2.6.30.
>
> If I disable CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ suspend/resume works in 2.6.30.
Thanks a lot for bisecting this!
Is it the reason for the enabling of interrupts during cpufreq_suspend()?
/me wonders
Is there anything we can do to fix this quickly?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists