linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245143108.6038.10.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:05:08 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling
 policy flag, fourth try

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:27 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: 
> (this is the fourth version of the patch, only change is that I added
> the missing Signed-off-by line, as Ingo requested)
> 
> This patch introduces a new flag SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK which can be passed
> to the kernel via sched_setscheduler(), ORed in the policy parameter. If
> set this will make sure that when the process forks a) the scheduling
> priority is reset to DEFAULT_PRIO if it was higher and b) the scheduling
> policy is reset to SCHED_NORMAL if it was either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
> 
> Why have this?
> 
> Currently, if a process is real-time scheduled this will 'leak' to all
> its child processes. For security reasons it is often (always?) a good
> idea to make sure that if a process acquires RT scheduling this is
> confined to this process and only this process. More specifically this
> makes the per-process resource limit RLIMIT_RTTIME useful for security
> purposes, because it makes it impossible to use a fork bomb to
> circumvent the per-process RLIMIT_RTTIME accounting.
> 
> This feature is also useful for tools like 'renice' which can then
> change the nice level of a process without having this spill to all its
> child processes.

That didn't work for me, reniced tasks with the flag set retained their
-nice status.  See patchlet and comments below. 

> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 8ec9d13..1db3e4a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2613,12 +2613,26 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
>  	set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child:
> +	 * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. Make sure we
> +	 * do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
>  	 */
> -	p->prio = current->normal_prio;

Nit: that comment/assignment was placed there to make sure that readers
knew that this specific line was critical to PI.  Now, it's mixed in
with something unrelated.
 
> +	if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
> +			(p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR))
> +		p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
> +
> +	if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
> +			(current->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO))
> +		p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
> +	else
> +		p->prio = current->normal_prio;
> +

I think it's cleaner to keep reset_on_fork functionality separate.
Thoughts on the below?

Make SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK to DTRT for reniced tasks, and make the sched_fork()
SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK bits a self-contained unlikely code block.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>

 kernel/sched.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 80636ed..cb6bbc6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2613,28 +2613,35 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
 	set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
 
 	/*
-	 * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. Make sure we
-	 * do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
+	 * Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
 	 */
-	if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
-			(p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR))
-		p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
+	p->prio = current->normal_prio;
 
-	if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
-			(current->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO))
-		p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
-	else
-		p->prio = current->normal_prio;
+	/*
+	 * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(p->sched_reset_on_fork)) {
+		if (p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR)
+			p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
+
+		if (p->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO)
+			p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
+
+		if (PRIO_TO_NICE(p->static_prio) < 0) {
+			p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0);
+			set_load_weight(p);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
+		 * fulfilled its duty:
+		 */
+		p->sched_reset_on_fork = 0;
+	}
 
 	if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
 		p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
 
-	/*
-	 * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
-	 * fulfilled its duty:
-	 */
-	p->sched_reset_on_fork = 0;
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
 	if (likely(sched_info_on()))
 		memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/