[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1245147122.17481.205.camel@nathan.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:12:02 +0200
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clean up vdso-layout.lds.S
Sam Ravnborg píše v Pá 12. 06. 2009 v 20:06 +0200:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:40:32PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > The handling of various sections in the VDSO linker script
> > looks pretty haphazard. This patch series cleans it up in
> > these regards:
> >
> > - improve the coding style
> > - remove superfluous sections
> > - issue a linker error if a section is encountered which
> > is known not to work
> > - check that the .got section is empty, except for the
> > three entries defined by the ABI
> > - discard sections which are not useful to user-space
> >
> > Petr Tesarik (8):
> > x86: Adjust the coding style of vdso-layout.lds.S
> > x86: Remove .sdata from the vDSO linker script
> > x86: add .broken section to the vDSO linker script
> > x86: mark altinstr-related sections in vDSO as broken
> > x86: mark some standard sections as broken in a vDSO
> > x86: check the size of GOT in vDSO
> > x86: remove unneeded section from the vDSO
> The above looks good.
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
What shall I do? Since Roland has some good ideas for improvement,
should I post a new patch series (v3), or should I add on top of the
acked one?
Petr Tesarik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists